The painting that matters most to Almas right now is one she made for an exhibition at Reem Art Gallery in the UAE. It is called Stony Stream at Dusk (2025), oil on canvas, and she talked about it the way people talk about places they have actually stood in: the sunset view, the water moving, small stones and pebbles, a stream swollen after rain, and in the distance, bushes. The sun's reflection on the water. She said it takes her back to her childhood.
That last detail is worth sitting with. Almas is self-taught, has been painting for around five years, and has one work in her current portfolio. The biographical facts are thin. But the attachment to this particular canvas is not thin at all. The specificity is telling — she is not describing a mood or a concept. She is describing a place, or the memory of one: the small stones, the rocks, the stream after rain, the exact quality of light on a moving surface at dusk.
Stony Stream at Dusk was made specifically for the Reem Art Gallery showing, which is the only exhibition in her record. The dossier lists it simultaneously as an exhibition and as an award — "selected for exhibition" treated as a credential — and the interview does not address how she came to show there, what the experience of exhibiting was like, or what came after. Those are the kinds of details that would fill out a picture of how a self-taught painter moves from private practice to public showing, and they are simply not available here. What is available is the painting itself, her account of making it, and her stated direction from here. She does not present the exhibition history as more than it is.
She works in oil and acrylic, based in Sharjah, and her stated territory is countryside landscape: green hillsides, flowing water, open sky. That territory is not unusual. What is worth paying attention to is how she thinks about working within it. When asked what she wants viewers to notice first, she was direct: "What attracts me most is the reflection of the sun on water, and the bushes in the distance. I want viewers to feel the same emotions I feel when I create." She is not describing a formal problem. She is describing a transfer of feeling, and she means it as a technical goal as much as an expressive one.
The technical question she has been working on is light on water. In Stony Stream at Dusk, she changed her brushwork and pushed the colours lighter and more bright to get the sun's reflection to read accurately on the moving surface. "I tried to make the colours lighter and more bright so that the sun's reflection would fall correctly on the water," she said. She added that this approach is becoming part of her style, though she offered that with some tentativeness — "I think" it is becoming part of her style — which is the honest answer for someone five years into a practice that is still forming. The hesitation is not evasion; it reads more like a painter checking herself against the evidence of her own canvases.
During the interview, conducted in Urdu, she returned more than once to the sensory particulars of that painting. The stream after rain. The stones. The sun low enough that its light hits the water at an angle and scatters. She described the bushes in the distance as part of what she finds calming — not a compositional device she chose strategically, but something she is drawn to and then works out how to render. The distinction matters because it suggests her process moves from feeling toward form rather than the other way around. She has not said this explicitly, and it would be wrong to state it as her intention. But the pattern in what she describes is consistent.
She named rainy weather as the condition she finds most calming, and said that being close to nature is what sustains her. That connection runs through Stony Stream at Dusk — the stream after rain is not incidental to the painting; it is the painting's occasion — and it runs through her account of what she wants to make going forward: countryside, green landscapes, water in motion. The work is not illustrating a theory about nature. It is closer to the other direction: she paints what she finds calming, and she wants the paintings to carry that feeling to whoever looks at them.
That ambition — that viewers should feel what she felt making the work — is the clearest thread in how she talks about her practice. She returned to it more than once during the conversation, each time phrasing it slightly differently, as if trying to get the formulation right. It is a demanding standard to set, and she sets it without qualification. She also described wanting the first glance to draw someone in before anything is explained — the feeling should arrive before the reading does. Whether that is achievable at the scale she currently works, and whether it changes at the larger scale she is moving toward, is an open question.
What she wants to do differently in the next stage of her work involves scale and depth. She said she wants to work on larger canvases, and she described her earlier work as not creating enough depth. The distinction she draws is between where she started and where she is now, and she frames the next stage as going further in the same direction rather than changing it. When the conversation turned to new techniques, she did not name a specific method — her answer stayed at the level of intention. The specifics are still ahead of her, which she acknowledged without apparent discomfort. She said she wants to try new things and create more depth, and left it there.
Her process for approaching a large canvas, as she described it, starts with choosing the scene. She thinks it through first, then works out how to build depth on the surface. That sequence — scene first, then depth as a problem to solve — suggests she thinks about composition before the brush touches the canvas rather than discovering it during painting. Whether that holds for the larger formats she is moving toward is genuinely unclear. She has not worked at that scale yet, and the interview did not get far enough into the detail to know what she expects will change.
One thread the interview did not resolve is influence. Almas did not name other painters, movements, or sources she has learned from, and the dossier does not supply them. For a self-taught painter five years into a practice, that absence could mean many things — that the influences are diffuse, that the conversation did not reach that question clearly, or that she has not yet framed her own development in those terms. What she did describe, consistently and in some detail, is the sensory experience she is trying to produce: the feeling of standing near moving water in fading light, the particular calm of rain and green landscape. That is the reference point she returns to, and it is experiential rather than art-historical.
Near the end of the conversation, she was asked whether the picture that had emerged — rain and nature as sources of calm, light on water as the central technical problem, larger canvases as the next step — felt accurate. She said it was right, and added that landscape, countryside, green landscapes, and flowing water are what she wants to continue with and take forward. "I want to continue with this and create more depth," she said. The sentence is both a plan and a description of where she already is.
What the record holds, at this point, is one publicly shown painting, a clear set of subjects, a developing approach to rendering light on water that she is beginning to think of as her own, and an intention to work larger. Stony Stream at Dusk — the stream after rain, the stones, the sun low on the water — is where all of those threads currently meet.
Discover more of Almas's work and available pieces on their Studio profile.
View Almas's Profile
